On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Corey <[email protected]> wrote: > > data in "unused" bits in a pointer? Even I know that's a bad idea. Is > it > > really that important to run your Javascript 2% faster? > > The difference is quite a bit more than 2%. The technique is sound, > imo, but it seems the implementations are lacking some safeguards. > This is interesting. I would really appreciate it very much if you don't mind elaborating a bit more for a non-programmer? Thanks! -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30v_g83VHK4
