Henning Brauer wrote:
> so this is matching inbound, aka routes you learn form any peer
>
> (note that this doesn't make sense for localpref, that is, as the name
> sez, local to your router)
Thanks, I didn't realize that the match/allow/deny rules apply only to
prefixes passing between neighbors, it's easier to think about this
way. Localpref is local to your IBGP, not just one router.
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> How about testing this diff instead. I think it should solve the missing
> filter updates. It compiles but I did not have the time to test it myself
> but I think it should work.
Just tested it and indeed it does indeed work, thanks for this, much
appreciated! We've only been using this in a lab environment for a few
days and it's great to see support like this, very promising and
should help to make the case to use this in production.
I've been putting my filter syntax examples on this page if anyone
comes across this thread and is curious:
http://falz.net/tech/openbgpd
--falz
