Hi,
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:41:20 +0900
Ryan McBride <[email protected]> wrote:
..
>| The output of `systat mbufs` is worth looking at, in particular the
>| figure for LIVELOCKS, and the LWM/CWM figures for the interface(s) in
>| question.
>|
>| If the livelocks value is very high, and the LWM/CWM numbers are very
>| small,
Thnak you for your help, Ryan.
It seems I'm in this situation:
5 users Load 0.17 0.15 0.10 (1-48 of 58) Fri Feb 25 20:27:44
2011
IFACE LIVELOCKS SIZE ALIVE LWM HWM CWM
System 256 82050 5446
2k 257 1252
lo0
em0 34 2k 4 4 256 4
em1 257 2k 4 4 256 4
em2 338382 2k 7 4 256 7
em3 8258 2k 4 4 256 4
em4 22635 2k 48 4 256 48
em5 3470 2k 6 4 256 6
em6 458241 2k 28 4 256 28
em7 8 2k 4 4 256 4
em8 33232 2k 50 4 256 50
em9 46878 2k 4 4 256 4
"systat -s 2 vmstat":
5 users Load 0.22 0.17 0.10 Fri Feb 25 20:28:18
2011
memory totals (in KB) PAGING SWAPPING Interrupts
real virtual free in out in out 25589 total
Active 741204 741204 1761104 ops 1600 clock
All 1278264 1278264 1761104 pages 11 ipi
1 em0
Proc:r d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt forks em1
15 32 5 117 22867 99 33 fkppw 2691 em2
fksvm em3
3.2%Int 0.1%Sys 0.0%Usr 0.0%Nic 96.8%Idle pwait 6778 em4
| | | | | | | | | | | relck 382 em5
|| rlkok 7328 em6
noram em7
Namei Sys-cache Proc-cache No-cache ndcpy 6724 em8
Calls hits % hits % miss % fltcp 74 em9
3 zfod uhci1
cow ehci0
Disks wd0 cd0 sd0 25328 fmin ehci1
seeks 33770 ftarg
pciide0 xfers
itarg com0 speed 241
wired com1 sec
pdfre pckbc0 pdscn
pzidle
44 kmapent
81542 IPKTS
78860 OPKTS
(it's on a device with MAX_INTS_PER_SEC=8000)
>|it is likely that the MCLGETI interface is protecting your system
>| from being completly flattened by forcing the em card to drop packets
>| (supported by your statement that the error rate is high).
>|
>| How about a _full_ dmesg, so someone can take a wild guess at what
>| your machine is capable of?
http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg
This device is not overloaded but it drop packets :-(
Manuel
