On 8/2/05, Michael C. Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just ran into a wall with the scponly option: > > "If you do use chroot(), your binary will need to be setuid." > > I'll pass on that one for now...
systrace could probably mitigate most of the risk here ... (privsep,
if you're good enough to hack in support to the source. I'm not. :))
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
encrypted email to the latter address please
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
