Attached patch OK?
Changes unsigned int to unsigned long to match __gdtoa due to gcc
becoming more strict with pointer types.From b73262a164978a1733777e6628c00c3672794dea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:42:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] __pformat_fpreg_bits: change to match __gdtoa prototype
The variable is only used within mingw_pformat.c, increasing
strictness in newer versions of GCC has turned this into an
error despite both integer widths are 32bit.
Correct so it matches the __gdtoa prototype declaration.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
---
mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_pformat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_pformat.c b/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_pformat.c
index 87902aea2..021c1eb4d 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_pformat.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_pformat.c
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ typedef union
signed short __pformat_fpreg_exponent;
};
unsigned short __pformat_fpreg_bitmap[5];
- unsigned int __pformat_fpreg_bits;
+ unsigned long __pformat_fpreg_bits;
} __pformat_fpreg_t;
#ifdef _WIN32
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
