On 1/16/19 11:46 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:42 PM JonY via Mingw-w64-public <
> mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/16/19 7:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>> I don't see a reason in keeping this compatibility code, It already won't
>>> work for C because of IDWriteFactory2 overloaded methods. Another reason
>>> is DWRITE_FONT_METRICS1 definition from dwrite_1.h, included from
>>> dwrite_2.h, which is also incompatible.
>>>
>>> P.S. what's a deal with WINBOOL, should it be used everywhere? I see it's
>>> used inconsistently, at least in dwrite*.h headers.
>>>
>>
>> WINBOOL is used to get around type conflicts when Objective C/C++ is
>> used. So, preferably WINBOOL is used.
>>
> 
> Right, I gathered that much from the way it's defined. But why does it
> matter for headers that are not meant to be used with Obj-C compiler?
> 
> 

Are you sure they're not meant to be used for Objc?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to