Hi Martell, André and Kai,
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 09.08.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Kai Tietz:
Hallo Martell,
patch is ok. Wouldn't it be better to have those symbols in linker
scrpt instead? That is actually the way used in ld for it.
Thanlks,
Kai
2016-08-06 5:14 GMT+02:00 Martell Malone <[email protected]>:
This patch should be the last piece of the puzzle.
Now c++ works, it relied heavily on ctors which was broken with clang and
lld.
Hi,
Kai could you please point Martell on some examples or related files in the
mingw-w64 tree?
I hope this way we can continue to fix this.
I see that this matter stalled last year when this was discussed...
I had a look at this, and if I understand things correctly, this is
handled somewhere in e.g.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=ld/scripttempl/pe.sc.
I don't think the LLD COFF linker supports such linker scripts, so I think
a clang/lld-based mingw needs to do things differently, using something
like Martell's patch.
One of the downsides of doing things differently between the two, is that
you basically need to link your executables using a linker that matches
the compiler used to build the mingw CRT. But I guess this is the only way
to handle it if things are to work with clang at all, right?
Kai approved the patch last year, so I guess it could be applied as a
first attempt at least? It shouldn't break the setup for normal users,
contrary to the patch that was reverted before.
// Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
