Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> schrieb am 11:39 Donnerstag, 25.Februar
2016:
> thank you for the patch. Nice catch. Patch is ok for apply. JonY
> will you take care?
Great.
I made some tests now to figure out why the wide-variant doesn't have the same
problem:
swscanf( L"1", L"%*u-" );
In mingw_wvfscanf.c there are 2 instances where EOF is used instead of WEOF (I
think that's wrong).
If I change those to WEOF as well, that same leak appears.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
