Hi guys,

I've long been a fan of the Mingw work and GCC more broadly, but the obligatory 
copyleft language in the threads subpackage for the most recent release is a 
significant issue that will force me to shift towards Clang or off of C++ 11 
entirely: I'm porting a reliable data replication package to C++ 11 but my 
users include companies that can't accept the GCC copyleft license.

Is it really necessary to force this copyleft language on your users?  And why 
is the license language hidden this way in a sub-library of the main platform?  
Seems sneaky and very unlike the historical GCC approach.

So obviously it isn't up to a user to tell the developers how to run their 
show.  But I do want to gently push back and say that some of us really prefer 
to make decisions knowingly, and to have choices.  This particularly licensing 
scheme is sneaky and gives no choice at all.

Ken
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to