2015-06-10 23:24 GMT+02:00 Adrien Nader <adr...@notk.org>: > My initial notes for possible other service providers: > > http://librelist.com/ for mailing-lists > - activity status unknown (not asked) > - dispute resolution process unknown (not asked) > - only mailing-lists > > http://www.tuxfamily.org/en/about for everything but bug tracker; but > bug tracker software can be installed without trouble > - not terribly active but definitely maintained > - admins are known and are free software activists, makes it possible to > take over in case some more admin is needed > > http://github.com for code hosting, web pages hosting (not binaries), > light bug tracker, not mailing-lists nor forums > - possible network effect (although I have some doubts considering the > difficulty of most tasks) > - hosting of large binaries is not guaranteed at all > - hosting of binaries is couple to actual releases > > https://notabug.org/ only code hosting? > - the gogs software is fairly new and doesn't have all features > needed as far as I know > > http://codingteam.net everything but forum and mailing-lists > - has a fairly nice look > - the website warns that their current resources are not enough for > livecd-style downloads and it's probably the same with large binaries > that are currently in the file release system > > http://savannah.nongnu.org or http://gna.org everything but forums > - mailing-lists! > - well-known > - need to check the current mingw-w64 usage of file downloads matches > well > - need to check how much graphical communication can be done on the > project page (remember there is already a website to serve as > frontend) >
Here's another two to add to the list: http://www.codeplex.com/ (see http://www.codeplex.com/) - mailing lists - source code - downloads - issue tracker - wiki - continuous integration bitbucket.org - might be limited to 5 "users" collaborating on a project - source code, - downloads, - issue tracker - wiki - no mailing lists and of course the always available option: Private server/hosting - costs money - needs someone maintaining the guts - can do everything at once - can it handle the load? I think it is a good idea to at least have project names taken on the large hosting sites (codeplex, github, savannah) so that the name is not taken by anyone else. The project can then link to the main site and mirror the git repository. If Sourceforge continues its actions like this, MinGW-w64 needs to keep its options open. No action is required now, but at least opening some doors never hurts, and reserving a project name with other hosting sites only spreads MinGW-w64 availability and fame. Cheers, Ruben > -- > Adrien Nader > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
