Am 28.07.2014 um 03:44 schrieb JonY:
> On 7/27/2014 23:50, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Am 26.07.2014 um 01:54 schrieb JonY:
>>> On 7/26/2014 06:20, André Hentschel wrote:
>>>> +double log2(double x) +{ + return softmath_log(x) / softmath_log(2); +}
>>
>>> Any reason not to expand softmath_log(2) into a constant? Otherwise, it
>>> looks OK.
>>
>>
>>
>> Like this?
>>
>
>
> Yes, but I'm not sure if 0.69314718246459960938d and
> 0.69314718246459960938f having the same precision matters, do you get
> the same results when tested against the original code?
>
>
the compiler trims the number to fit in a float, and having the same number
makes the code easier to read, further we could make up a macro or simple
definition for it...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
