On 7/27/2014 23:44, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > Hi guys, > > I stumbled upon a strange question on Stackoverflow.com: > http://stackoverflow.com/q/24962205/256138 > > Is he right to think the generated code is suboptimal? Or is this an ABI > requirement? Can GCC be improved in this regard? > > I can point him to this mailing list and ask him to supply reproducible > proof of what he's claiming if you guys think it worthwhile. >
I think it is best you point him to gcc[of]gcc.gnu.org or gcc-help, his question don't exactly touch on mingw-w64 headers/crt.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
