On 5/16/2014 20:07, Kai Tietz wrote: > The point, which isn't completed IMO, is that we still need to specify > how our process for patch-sending, review, and actually acceptance > shall work with git. > As long as this isn't made clear, I still set a veto to the move from > SVN to GIT.
Basically, those stay the same, send patches by email for review. Once accepted, then push happens, like with SVN.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
