2013/6/28 Jacek Caban <[email protected]>: > On 06/28/13 01:39, dw wrote: >>> While I wasn't fun of adding new header in your previous patch (why >>> would we do that if it's included only from one file, intrin.h, >>> anyway?), we may add (yet another:/) new header for those shared intrins >>> and include it both from winnt.h and intrin.h. >> >> I'm not sure I completely understand how you envision this working. >> Are you talking about moving the prototypes from intrin.h to this new >> file too? > > Yes, but only those that are duplicated between headers.
Yes, here the ability to declare just selective intrinsics out of intrinsic-header comes to play. >> How strongly do you feel about this? > > I don't feel strongly at all about the solution I proposed, but I feel > very strongly that requiring users to include intrin.h for stuff present > in winnt.h is wrong. Agreed. > Jacek Nevertheless it would be good to have finally this subject resolved. We live now over three weeks with an bug introduced due signature-changes. Cheers. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
