On 7/1/2012 22:25, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> why should we remove asprintf?  I think the correct patch would be to
> remove the inline-version of asprintf and vasprintf and to rename the
> prototypes __mingw_asprintf to asprintf and __mingw_vasprintf to
> vasprintf.  Additionally of course the implementation-files in crt
> have to be renamed to.
> 
> Kai

Will that expose asprintf without __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO in use? Should
we poison it if __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO define is missing?

My worry is that users will start using ms-printf format for these.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to