[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17326198#comment-17326198
]
Benoit Tellier commented on MIME4J-255:
---------------------------------------
> Would someone please integrate this change or explain why it can not be
> accepted.
Hello Rebbecca,
Thanks for the follow up. I have no idea why the PR was closed in the first
place. Indeed the change seems quite legitimate to me.
I did reopened it and hopefully it should receive the attention it deserves in
the coming days and can likely be merged timely.
Thanks for your patience and your contribution,
Regards,
Benoit
> MimeStreamParser: Add method to allow setting of "no recurse" mode to
> underlying mime token stream
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-255
> Project: James Mime4j
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Felix Knecht
> Priority: Minor
>
> MimeStreamParser does not allow to set the option NO_RECURSE
> All other options can be set, except that one. And of course this is the one
> I'm interested in.
> I made a github pull request a while ago, but it was closed:
> https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/4
> Resteasy is having problems parsing requests when the request contains EML
> files.
> See: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1255
> I hope this can still make it into 0.8! Are there service releases for
> earlier versions? Especially 0.6 since that is what resteasy is using.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
