Depends on your chelation needs. EGTA is preferred if you do not want to reduce Mg++ activity.
Hiranya S. Roychowdhury, Ph.D. Professor Department of Science Division of Science, Engineering and Math NMSU-Dona Ana Community College 575 527 7725 (office) Co-Chair, NMSU Faculty Grievance Review Board Curriculum & Instruction Committee Human Anatomy and Physiology Society<http://www.hapsweb.org/> [http://www.hapsweb.org/graphics/header.jpg] ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:20:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: EGTA On Thursday, October 7, 1999 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Chong Wai Yin( Zhang Weixian) wrote: > Hi people! Can anyone tell me are there any difference between using EDTA > and EGTA in lysis buffer. Is the function of EGTA the same as EDTA? Thank > you for answering. > > Regards > Kelvin Zhang Anyone know of a chelator that can bind Ca2+ without binding Zn2+ as well? I can't find any in most charts. _______________________________________________ Methods mailing list [email protected] http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/methods _______________________________________________ Methods mailing list [email protected] http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/methods
