In message: [meta-virtualization][PATCH] podman: Use packageconfig to control fuse-overlayfs depend on 10/03/2026 Yiding Liu (Fujitsu) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> The RDEPEND fuse-overlayfs is an Optional package so use packageconfig to > control it. > > Refer to https://podman.io/docs/installation > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yiding <[email protected]> > --- > recipes-containers/podman/podman_git.bb | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-containers/podman/podman_git.bb > b/recipes-containers/podman/podman_git.bb > index 53b9b6a0..4495d2d9 100644 > --- a/recipes-containers/podman/podman_git.bb > +++ b/recipes-containers/podman/podman_git.bb > @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ EXTRA_OEMAKE = " \ > PODMAN_FEATURES ?= "docker" > > PACKAGECONFIG ?= "" > -PACKAGECONFIG[rootless] = ",,,fuse-overlayfs slirp4netns,," > +PACKAGECONFIG[rootless] = ",,,slirp4netns,," > +PACKAGECONFIG[fuse] = ",,,fuse-overlayfs,," Whether right or wrong, fuse-overlayfs was being pulled in by rootless. So it should stay pulled in by rootless (unless you can show me that there's no requirement at all from rootless .. and that information needs to be in the commit message). It can also just stay in both, since last I checked, having the depdendency in twice doesn't cause any issues. Bruce > > do_compile() { > cd ${S}/src > -- > 2.43.0 > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9638): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/9638 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/118237141/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
