http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23087
--- Comment #4 from Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]> 2009-08-03 11:13:10 PST --- Just for the record, I still disagree about changing it for R300-R500. First of all, neither the GL enum values nor the hardware values are ever going to change. They are fixed for all eternity by specification on the one side and physical processes on the other. Second, the relation between the hardware value and the GL enums is no accident, because, when you think about it, the bit patterns have a meaning (basically a kind of table lookup based on src and dst values). So at least in that way, the bit fiddling is *more* true to what is happening here on a fundamental level than a switch statement would be. The latter point is the reason why I'm following up on a closed bug report at all. Maybe you already knew about the bit-level meaning of those values, but if you didn't, I encourage you to think about it; it's actually quite an interesting piece of bit hacking folklore! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
