Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-31 16:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=5777)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=5777&action=view)
attempt to fix swz in mesa
Is there a good reason why the swz field only must be 8 bits?
This patch changes it to be the same as the prog_src Swizzle field (so 37 bits
instead of 33 bits out of 64 are used).
And, the OPCODE_SWZ handling is completely changed (no longer tries to emulate
it with multiple RSW instructions), the code got much, much easier to
understand and as a bonus it seems to work...
However, I haven't looked at the codegen stuff yet. Maybe there's some bad
interference there (it certainly won't work without changes).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
