On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Ian Romanick <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/08/2015 08:17 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: >> On 09/08/2015 08:10 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> I'll give it a shot on NVIDIA and see what happens... my tests might >>> require GL 3.2 because I didn't want to deal with the various >>> differences that happen otherwise. >> >> That should be good enough. Perhaps someone else can try on AMD >> closed-source drivers. If they both ignore the spec, then I feel pretty >> comfortable ignoring it too... while I work on getting it changed. > > I have attached the spec changes that I am proposing.
This drops the dependence on images, which means that gallium drivers can get this straight away. From a "allow the extension to run on as many devices as possible" standpoint, this makes sense. There's an alternate viewpoint which is that this should perhaps require *both* images and ARB_texture_multisample (without requiring any specific GLSL version). I've only looked at things from the driver writer's standpoint, i.e. "make as many exts available as possible", so I'm definitely in favor :) But I could also easily live with leaving the images requirement in there. -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
