A very dangerous convention, IMO... it turns into infinite loops and
other oddness in release builds. Should really just be done when it's
really unreachable. (Perhaps that's the case here, dunno.)

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Chris Forbes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Recent convention has been to use unreachable("str") rather than 
> assert(!"str")
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ---
>>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp | 9 +++------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp 
>> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
>> index 92d1085..dcbd240 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
>> @@ -381,8 +381,7 @@ vec4_vs_visitor::emit_program_code()
>>           break;
>>
>>        default:
>> -         _mesa_problem(ctx, "Unsupported opcode %s in vertex program\n",
>> -                       _mesa_opcode_string(vpi->Opcode));
>> +         assert(!"Unsupported opcode in vertex program");
>>        }
>>
>>        /* Copy the temporary back into the actual destination register. */
>> @@ -574,15 +573,13 @@ vec4_vs_visitor::get_vp_src_reg(const 
>> prog_src_register &src)
>>           break;
>>
>>        default:
>> -         _mesa_problem(ctx, "bad uniform src register file: %s\n",
>> -                       
>> _mesa_register_file_name((gl_register_file)src.File));
>> +         assert(!"Bad uniform in src register file");
>>           return src_reg(this, glsl_type::vec4_type);
>>        }
>>        break;
>>
>>     default:
>> -      _mesa_problem(ctx, "bad src register file: %s\n",
>> -                    _mesa_register_file_name((gl_register_file)src.File));
>> +      assert(!"Bad src register file");
>>        return src_reg(this, glsl_type::vec4_type);
>>     }
>>
>> --
>> 2.4.3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to