On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 20:41 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On Monday, June 01, 2015 11:35:03 AM Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > > > > I'm not sure if we shouldn't enable this everywhere > > and rip out the API checks, > > > > discuss, > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > > --- > > src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c > > b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c > > index b1057f3..3b828fa 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c > > +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c > > @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ void st_init_extensions(struct pipe_screen > > *screen, > > extensions->ARB_half_float_vertex = GL_TRUE; > > extensions->ARB_internalformat_query = GL_TRUE; > > extensions->ARB_map_buffer_range = GL_TRUE; > > + extensions->ARB_shader_subroutine = GL_TRUE; > > extensions->ARB_texture_border_clamp = GL_TRUE; /* XXX temp */ > > extensions->ARB_texture_cube_map = GL_TRUE; > > extensions->ARB_texture_env_combine = GL_TRUE; > > > > I know people have talked about enabling it everywhere 1.30+ is > available. That makes some sense. > > Here's an argument for keeping it optional: We don't want people > using > this extension, so there's no value - in fact, negative value - to > exposing it unless we have to. Ignorant question, but why don't you want people using it?
> Drivers that can't do 4.0, such as > Sandybridge, could avoid advertising it if we kept it optional. > > I'm happy to defer to majority opinion.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
