https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88962
--- Comment #4 from Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> --- The first patch looks good. I posted something similar to mesa-dev yesterday. But the second patch doesn't seem right. There could be post-process stages that don't care about the depth/stencil buffer but we'd still want them to run. So instead, I think the pp_mlaa.c code should check for a missing/null depth/stencil buffer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
