On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > On Mit, 2014-01-29 at 12:18 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Chad Versace >> <chad.vers...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > Mesa now has a real, feature-rich EGL implementation on X11 via xcb. >> > Therefore I believe there is no longer a practical need for the egl_glx >> > driver. >> > >> > Furthermore, egl_glx appears to be unmaintained. The most recent >> > nontrivial commit driver was 6baa5f1 on 2011-11-25. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chad Versace <chad.vers...@linux.intel.com> >> > --- >> >> In a similar vein -- is gallium_egl useful for anything these days? >> The only time I hear it mentioned is when telling others to not use >> it. > > In contrast to egl_dri2, egl_gallium supports OpenVG.
I suppose I could ask whether OpenVG is useful for anything these days? :) I've heard on IRC that we could simply add OpenVG support to DRI if anyone actually cared about it. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
