Hi Everyone, We've talked about these issues in the RADV team recently, and we believe they concern everyone else too, so I'd like to propose a discussion about stable releases.
1. How can we help make the release manager's job easier? Dylan, could you share with us how this process works? I admit that I'm not sure how much effort needs to go into creating stable releases such as 20.3.X. How much of it is automated, what do you need to do manually? How much testing needs to go into a release? Most importantly, what could we (the dev team) do to help you? 2. How can we help distro maintainers ship up to date stable releases? For example, latest Ubuntu and Pop! OS are stuck at mesa 20.2.x, but Ubuntu LTS and Linux Mint have it even worse at mesa 20.0.x (according to distrowatch). I think this is sad because these are considered very popular and are often suggested to beginners and gamers. In reality, people who run these distros won't be able to use the latest HW, won't benefit from any of the work we put into mesa drivers during the past 6+ months and will experience all the bugs which we have solved a long time ago. (I know there are 3rd party repositories which cater to this, but that's not the same as getting 1st party support from an OS vendor.) What could we do to make the job of distro package maintainers easier and to compel them to upgrade to better supported releases? Maybe we could make fewer new mesa releases per year, but support each release for longer? Or try to better line up the mesa releases with distro releases? I'd really like to hear it from a distro maintainer's point of view, what keeps you on a release as old as 20.0 or 20.2 when you know that this seriously hurts your user experience? Best regards, Timur _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
