On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 08:04 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > And if you're not going to use cargo, is rust really a win?
Sure. When people talk about Rust in context of advantages against other languages, I don't remember Cargo ever being mentioned. People love it for other reasons. > The standard library is rather minimal "because just pull in 1000 crates". The > distro people can correct me if I'm wrong, but when librsvg went to rust it > was > a nightmare, several distros went a long time without updates because of > cargo. IIRC, the problem wit librsvg was because Clang didn't support some CPU architectures on which librsvg was used. So people simply could not build it. I don't remember hearing about any other issues. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
