On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 08:57 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:51 AM Erik Faye-Lund > <erik.faye-l...@collabora.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 22:24 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > In the meanwhile (unless you plan on taking up Jason's > > > suggestion), > > > might I recommend some assert's for the unhandled cases so that > > > there > > > are no surprises? > > > > Good idea. I sent a MR for it here: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/2380 > > Not sure that approach works, esp with SSO.
If so, wouldn't that already be a problem with the existing lower_depth_clamp-stuff, then? I mean, I just lifted the logic from there... > I was thinking just like > somewhere in st_extensions where it's checking these things -- if > GS/tess are supported, make sure caps a/b/c aren't enabled. Right. I guess that could also be done... _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
