On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:54:22 +0200 Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 15:24, Boris Brezillon > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's no point duplicating the code, and it will help us simplify > > the bo_handles[] filling logic in panfrost_drm_submit_job(). > > Looks good but, could we drop panfrost_memory completely? Other > drivers seem to do fine wthout such a thing. We need a wrapper that contains a BO plus a pb_slab object for SLAB-based allocations (allocation of sub-page-size objects), that's exactly what panfrost_memory is right now. We can rename it if you like, but I don't think we can get rid of it. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
