Hello Marek,
is this (#7) obsolete, now?
Kind reminder.
Thanks,
Dieter
Am 13.06.2019 02:40, schrieb Marek Olšák:
From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
The compilation is faster on LLVM 9.
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_pipe.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_pipe.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_pipe.c
index 8527999645b..d2fd058f2cd 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_pipe.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_pipe.c
@@ -115,21 +115,22 @@ static const struct debug_named_value
debug_options[] = {
DEBUG_NAMED_VALUE_END /* must be last */
};
static void si_init_compiler(struct si_screen *sscreen,
struct ac_llvm_compiler *compiler)
{
/* Only create the less-optimizing version of the compiler on APUs
* predating Ryzen (Raven). */
bool create_low_opt_compiler = !sscreen->info.has_dedicated_vram &&
- sscreen->info.chip_class <= GFX8;
+ sscreen->info.chip_class <= GFX8 &&
+ HAVE_LLVM < 0x0900;
enum ac_target_machine_options tm_options =
(sscreen->debug_flags & DBG(SI_SCHED) ? AC_TM_SISCHED : 0) |
(sscreen->debug_flags & DBG(GISEL) ? AC_TM_ENABLE_GLOBAL_ISEL :
0) |
(sscreen->info.chip_class >= GFX9 ? AC_TM_FORCE_ENABLE_XNACK :
0) |
(sscreen->info.chip_class < GFX9 ? AC_TM_FORCE_DISABLE_XNACK :
0) |
(!sscreen->llvm_has_working_vgpr_indexing ?
AC_TM_PROMOTE_ALLOCA_TO_SCRATCH : 0) |
(sscreen->debug_flags & DBG(CHECK_IR) ? AC_TM_CHECK_IR : 0) |
(create_low_opt_compiler ? AC_TM_CREATE_LOW_OPT : 0);
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
