> No problem, I'll rebase once this work has landed. I thought it has?
> Hm, the list of allowed ops is likely to differ (doesn't make sense to > allow txs instructions when building a midgard tex instruction) so I'm > not sure it's a good idea to share this switch statement. Well, I was maybe more suggesting the switch statement up there would return NULL/false/-1/whatever for a NIR op not representable by a (single) Midgard tex instruction. So we call for the op at the beginning, and based on the results choose between two different funciton calls (one for a Midgard tex op, one for special handling). Not sure, just wondering :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
