On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:36:52 +0200, Sven Joachim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-05-17 17:17 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On 2012-05-17 15:58 +0200, Brian Paul wrote: > > > >> On 05/17/2012 04:42 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Commit 63720114b42 in mesa removed the GLw source which is now provided > >>> in a separate source tree. However, no release has been made from that > >>> tree yet, so users of Mesa 8.0+ have to resort to the git tree to obtain > >>> GLw. I don't personally care about GLw, but in Debian there are still a > >>> few packages that use it¹. > >>> > >>> How about making a GLw release, say with a version of 8.0? > >> > >> The Mesa version number isn't really applicable to GLw. > > > > This may be so, but starting with 8.0 would make it easier for distros > > who have already provided 7.x.y packages from the Mesa source. > > At least that was the rationale why demos started at 8.0.0 in the first > release after they were moved to their own repository. > > For Debian it would be a minor inconvenience to re-start with version > 1.0, don't know about other distros.
Yeah, revving versions of split out packages back to 1.0 is a minor pain for every distro, and is good to avoid.
pgpFJaG9VhIiK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
