On Wednesday, 2018-09-05 10:26:14 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > Quoting Eric Anholt (2018-09-05 10:05:15) > > Eric Engestrom <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > According to 4fc0ebdff55419965919e "broadcom/vc4: Bump libdrm > > > requirement", > > > vc4 is a special case here as it does not use its libdrm_vc4, but only > > > depends > > > on core libdrm. > > > > > > The way the version check was added however means that the core libdrm > > > dependency() needs to be explicitly required if vc4 is being built. > > > > > > Fixes: 4fc0ebdff55419965919e "broadcom/vc4: Bump libdrm requirement" > > > Cc: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > meson.build | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build > > > index 55416020402620a2565e..474d8692a956b0151b5c 100644 > > > --- a/meson.build > > > +++ b/meson.build > > > @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ endforeach > > > with_gallium_drisw_kms = false > > > dep_libdrm = dependency( > > > 'libdrm', version : '>=' + _drm_ver, > > > - required : with_dri2 or with_dri3 > > > + required : with_dri2 or with_dri3 or with_gallium_vc4 > > > > vc4 without with_dri2 or with_dri3? I'm confused. > > I guess it is theoretically possible to hit this case, if you were to build > vc4 > with the gallium xlib base glx and no egl then I guess you could hit this? > Maybe?
Yeah, I didn't check but this felt like it was possible. At best, this fixes a possible build issue. At worst, this is an explicit check that turns out to be redundant. > > Dylan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
