On Thursday, 2018-03-22 15:28:49 +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 22 March 2018 at 15:20, Derek Foreman <der...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > commit 03dd9a88b0be17ff0ce91e92f6902a9a85ba584a introduced per surface > > queues, but the display_sync for swrast_commit_backbuffer remained on > > the old queue. This is likely to break when dispatching the correct > > queue at the top of function (which can't dispatch the sync callback > > we're waiting for). > > > > The easiest known reproduction case is running weston-subsurfaces under > > weston --use-pixman > > Oh dear. Pushed now with review. For future though, can you please use > the 'Fixes:' annotation, which in this case would've been for > 03dd9a88b0be? Don't feel too bad though, because I also forgot to add > it when pushing.
We want this in stable, right? Would've been done automatically with the Fixes: tag, but I cc'ed mesa-stable@ now, so it's nominated :) > > Cheers, > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
