I can test piglit+CTS+deqp on the GPU that I have. (currently Polaris12) Marek
On Mar 7, 2018 10:53 AM, "Emil Velikov" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 March 2018 at 15:13, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3 March 2018 at 15:40, Marek Olšák <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hi Alex, > >>> > >>> On 28 February 2018 at 15:25, Alex Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Could this (commit 5d61fa4e68b7eb6d481a37efdbb35fdce675a6ad on > master) be > >>>> backported to the 17.3 branch to allow it to build with LLVM 6? > >>>> > >>> Normally we don't aim to support LLVM versions released after the .0 > >>> Mesa release is out. > >>> Not that we don't want to - there is simply not enough testing > happening. > >>> > >>> Sometimes picking the odd build fix is enough, but not always. > >>> > >>> As a matter of fact, the only feedback for the AMD drivers status > >>> (brokenness) is the LunarG testing rig. > >>> > >>> Michel, usually you are usually more realistic/conservative on with > >>> this kind of changes. > >> > >> Are you saying that I'm less realistic? :) > >> > > You're right - my wording was bad. I should have only said conservative. > > > > I would love to see agreement within the AMD team - one way or another. > > If the decision is to go with these kind of changes, testing will also > > be appreciated. > > > > Be that independent individuals, teams, other. Let me ask if the > > Lunarg team can add LLVM version to the test matrix. > > > Have some good news - the Lunarg team will add LLVM 6.0 in the list. > So as soon as we get that + there's no glaring regressions I think > we'll be in decent shape. > > For anyone wondering why I tend towards the conservative side: > - making it build, hence having partial LLVM X support is not enough > The 'partial' word will be missed and you'll get plenty of unhappy > users as regressions happen > > - missing a wide/popular test base > The odd report of game X working fine is _greatly_ appreciated, yet > quite limited > > - test results are not [easily] accessible by many people > We want something to refer to as we decide to allow (or forbid) LLVM X > > HTH > Emil >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
