On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Lionel Landwerlin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/11/17 05:45, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>> The previous iteration algorithm would advance the field pointer right
>> after we advance the group.  This meant that you would end up with
>> skipping the first field of the group.  In the common case, where the
>> only field is a struct (e.g. 3DSTATE_VERTEX_BUFFERS), it would get
>> skipped entirely.
>> ---
>>   src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
>> b/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
>> index d09b6ea..b3501ae 100644
>> --- a/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
>> +++ b/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
>> @@ -824,14 +824,15 @@ iter_advance_group(struct gen_field_iterator *iter)
>>   static bool
>>   iter_advance_field(struct gen_field_iterator *iter)
>>   {
>> -   while (!iter_more_fields(iter)) {
>>
>
> If I remember correctly, I added a while to deal with empty groups.
> gen75.xml SF_CLIP_VIEWPORT has one and this will trigger a segfault.
>

I see empty groups in SF_CLIP_VIEWPORT on gen7 and gen75, SF_VIEWPORT on
gen6, and 3DSTATE_SAMPLE_PATTERN on gen8.  I'm happy to just disallow that
and delete them from the XML.


> We might be better off taking it out. Otherwise, looks good :
>
> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
>
>
> +   if (iter_more_fields(iter)) {
>> +      iter->field = iter->field->next;
>> +   } else {
>>         if (!iter_more_groups(iter))
>>            return false;
>>           iter_advance_group(iter);
>>      }
>>   -   iter->field = iter->field->next;
>>      if (iter->field->name)
>>         strncpy(iter->name, iter->field->name, sizeof(iter->name));
>>      else
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to