Quick question, I noticed that Mesa and gallium both implement rtasm...
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: assert(p->need_emms);
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 0;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/gallium/auxiliary/rtasm/rtasm_x86sse.h: unsigned need_emms:8;
src/gallium/auxiliary/translate/translate_sse.c: if (p->func->need_emms)
src/mesa/tnl/t_vertex_sse.c: if (p->func.need_emms)
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: assert(p->need_emms);
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 0;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.c: p->need_emms = 1;
src/mesa/x86/rtasm/x86sse.h: int need_emms;
This causes a conflict when libgallium.a is linked with libmesa.a into
libGL.so:
http://twitpic.com/89dbuu/full
(if statement detecting a 1 for need_emms then on the next line seeing a 0)
As libmesa's state_tracker and libmesa's rtasm require gallium's rtasm.. it
seems i've hit a catch 22 here.
Any thoughts on this? I can't figure out how to solve it without large
changes.
Thanks!
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
