On 01/17/2012 03:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Ian Romanick<[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/17/2012 12:58 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1292,6 +1292,11 @@ case $DRI_DIRS in
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([INTEL], [libdrm_intel>= $LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED])
case $DRI_DIRS in
+ *i915*)
+ HAVE_I915_DRI=yes;
+ ;;
+ esac
+ case $DRI_DIRS in
Why are these in separate case statements?
Because otherwise --with-dri-drivers=i915,i965 would only enable i915.
If there's another way to do this, I'm okay with it.
Oh, right. How about some variation of
for d in $(echo $DRI_DIRS | sed 's/,/ /g'); do
case $d in
i915) ...;;
i965) ...;;
esac
done
It may be a bit more fidgety to get working initially, but it's more
obvious and easier to extend with other drivers. It also makes it
possible to support driver names that are substrings of other driver names.
+# Copyright © 2011 Matt Turner<[email protected]>
2012?
Heh, yes.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
