On 16/08/17 14:22, Brian Paul wrote:
From: Frank Richter <[email protected]>

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102241
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
---
  src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c | 9 ++++++++-
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c 
b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
index e169139..e4a1cae 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
@@ -69,10 +69,17 @@ os_time_get_nano(void)
static LARGE_INTEGER frequency;
     LARGE_INTEGER counter;
+   int64_t secs, nanosecs;
     if(!frequency.QuadPart)
        QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
     QueryPerformanceCounter(&counter);
-   return counter.QuadPart*INT64_C(1000000000)/frequency.QuadPart;
+   /* Compute seconds and nanoseconds parts separately to
+    * reduce severity of precision loss.
+    */
+   secs = counter.QuadPart / frequency.QuadPart;
+   nanosecs = (counter.QuadPart % frequency.QuadPart) * INT64_C(1000000000)
+      / frequency.QuadPart;
+   return secs*INT64_C(1000000000) + nanosecs;
#else

Series looks great.

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to