On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:11:58 +0800, Yuanhan Liu <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 07:51:46PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On 12/22/2011 07:04 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:33:03PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > >> On 12/21/2011 01:33 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >>> -#define BRW_EU_MAX_INSN_STACK 5
> > >>> -#define BRW_EU_MAX_INSN 10000
> > >>> +#define BRW_EU_MAX_INSN_STACK   5
> > >>> +#define BRW_EU_MAX_INSN         (1024 * 1024)
> > >>
> > >> I'm actually surprised to see BRW_EU_MAX_INSN at all.  As far as I know,
> > >> there isn't an actual hardware limit on the number of instructions,
> > > 
> > > Glad to know that. Thanks.
> > > 
> > >> so
> > >> I'm not sure why we should cap it at all.  Especially not to some
> > >> arbitrary number.  (I'm assuming that 1024 * 1024 is just something you
> > >> came up with arbitrarily...)
> > > 
> > > Aha, yes, you are right, I made it. :)
> > > 
> > > Here is the fixed patch, please help to review it:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
> > 
> > I'd wait for an ack from Eric before pushing, though.
> 
> It's OK to me. Eric, comments? Or, can I get your reviewed-by for this
> series?

Yeah, the remainder are also

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>

Attachment: pgp5GmxbYHvN8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to