> On Jul 6, 2017, at 13:08, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 05:07, Matt Arsenault <arse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 5, 2017, at 19:09, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Use family, but only set xnack+ for gfx9. >>> >> >> The driver shouldn’t be explicitly setting this. This should be set as part >> of the subtarget chosen > > Well I expect Marek knows more (I'm just aligning the drivers). > > If I had to guess, it's probably because Carrizo sets xnack in the > subtarget but we don't want to use it. > > Dave.
This is the problematic part, if you explicitly disable a subtarget feature when it is set in the subtarget’s feature list, it for some reason disables all of the features in the subtarget _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
