On 12/23/2011 10:51 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Ian Romanick <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12/23/2011 07:20 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote: >>> Couldn't we restructure this such that OpenVG (and all other state >>> trackers on Linux) still use a dri2 driver, but one which exposes an >>> additional (gallium specific) interface? >> I was going to suggest something similar. I think we want fewer EGL >> backends to test and maintain, not more. Right? > I totally agree with that. I even had an unfinished branch for that. > > Note that this thread is about dropping multiple EGL driver support. > The motivation for having OpenVG in DRI2 drivers is that we do not > want multiple EGL drivers. The former should push the latter to > happen more quickly, instead of preventing it from happening.
I'm totally in favor of having a single EGL driver. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
