Emil Velikov <[email protected]> writes: > On 4 July 2017 at 16:04, Rafael Avila de Espindola > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Emil Velikov <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> So the version is FOOgit-$SHA while the DSO uses, FOOsvn. At the same >>> time at least 3.9.0/3.9.1 has broken llvm-config --libnames/libfiles, >>> so we cannot rely on that. >>> Doesn't seem like LLVM is giving us something robust to work with here. >>> >>> LLVM users/devs (Rafael), I would suggest up-streaming a patch which >>> changes that toggle default value, for now. >>> As LLVM does a few releases where it has a reliable way of determining >>> the library name users can switch to it. >>> >>> How does this sound? >> >> I am not sure I understand why having the hash in the version causes >> problems. >> > Because llvm-config --libnames/libfiles is unreliable ;-( Hence we use > llvm-config --version to get the DSO name.
OK, looks like that is the real bug that needs to be fixed. Is there a bug report? Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
