On 26.04.2017 04:45, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
On 24/04/17 20:35, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
The spec doesn't clearly state this, but I have got clarifiation
from the spec authors.
Okay, that answers my question from the other email.
BTW, what about samplers? It seems that this code doesn't check for
samplers at all? Anyway, this patch:
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <[email protected]>
---
src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
index a63f9da912..5ef99bf504 100644
--- a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
+++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
@@ -6944,7 +6944,7 @@
ast_process_struct_or_iface_block_members(exec_list *instructions,
_mesa_glsl_error(&loc, state, "atomic counter in
structure");
}
- if (decl_type->contains_image()) {
+ if (!state->has_bindless() && decl_type->contains_image()) {
/* FINISHME: Same problem as with atomic counters.
* FINISHME: Request clarification from Khronos and add
* FINISHME: spec quotation here.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
