On Wednesday, 2017-03-08 16:55:12 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 6 March 2017 at 18:21, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 23 February 2017 at 17:13, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
> >>
> >> This makes it easier/clearer as to:
> >>  - if the file should have the execute bit set (.py should not)
> >>  - do we need the shebang in the first place and if so what it should be
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
> >> ---
> >> This is going to clash with my earlier fixes in the area.
> > This patches fix one case but break another. I have more elaborate
> > fixes in progress, but in the meanwhile,
> >
> > Humble ping on the remaining patches - pretty much all of them remove
> > python shebang which we don't need in the first place ;-)
> >
> Final call - barring any objections I like to get these in later on today.
> 
> -Emil

On the python shebang issue, I usually like to keep the information of
which version is supported in the script itself instead of pushing the
responsibility to the callers, but it seems like this wasn't really done
here, so no objection on removing them.

Series is::
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com>

Cheers,
  Eric
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to