Pushed. Marek
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <nota...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, as there are no better solutions in sight, can somebody please > push this patch? > > Gražvydas > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >>> On 14/02/17 08:25 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>>> I've changed my mind. The patch can be merged if nobody disagrees. >>> >>> It would be nice to better understand what exactly the problem is. It >>> seems unlikely that it's actually an endianness specific problem in the >>> driver code, more likely an endianness specific problem in state tracker >>> code, or maybe a non-endianness-specific problem in the driver code >>> (which may or may not be possible to hit on big endian hosts as well). >>> >>> In other words, I suspect this isn't a fix for the actual problem, but >>> just a workaround. That said, if you guys are happy with that, I'm not >>> holding it up. >> >> I tend to agree, but OTOH, r300 is pretty old and BE systems are >> pretty few and far between these days. Neither of which are conducive >> to spending much time on them. Someone with an interest in BE systems >> really needs to step up and fix up endian handling in mesa for real. >> >> Alex _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
