On 2 February 2017 at 13:09, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 February 2017 at 02:58, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/02/17 09:10 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> On 1 February 2017 at 23:28, Vinson Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Fixes: b8acb6b17981 ("configure: Require libdrm >= 2.4.75") >>>> Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee <[email protected]> >>> Are you sure that's correct ? >>> >>> Afaict the follow-up commits make use of updated i915_drm.h which >>> should be provided by your distro's libdrm-dev package. >> >> This seems to be at the heart of the confusion here: Is i915_drm.h part >> of libdrm or of libdrm_intel? I'd argue it's the latter, and the fact >> that some or even all downstreams ship a single package with all libdrm* >> headers is irrelevant. That package also contains all the libdrm_*.pc >> files, so Vinson's patch works as intended either way. >> > Are you saying that there's a single -dev package [libdrm-dev] for > everything libdrm* related ? > That sounds like a broken distro package... which would explain some > of the assumptions/discussions on #dri-devel :-)
That is how all distros ship it. Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
