On 11/08/2011 12:30 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Second, it would really help to clearly distinguish headers that are meant to
> be used exclusive by C++ with a different suffix (e.g., .hpp). And leave .h
> for headers that are meant for joint C/C++ consuption.
>
> Take e.g., ../glsl/program.h, are these supposed to be C functions or C++
> functions? There's no way to tell just from reading the headers. So it's not
> clear if those type/functions should be inside extern "C" {..} or not.
>
>
> Is this OK?I agree. Pure C++ headers should have the .hpp extension. That would eliminate some unnecessary confusion. -- Chad Versace [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
