On 4 November 2016 at 11:29, Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > > The spec doesn't seem to say this is illegal anywhere, it is > unexpected, but I've got an app doing what appears to be this. > > This change splits out setting the base addresses to a separate > function, if the image has no memory bound we wait until > descriptor update time to bind the base addresses, after this > point they should be immutable.
Actually this is unnecesary, the app was failing to find a memory type, though I'm still not sure if we do in theory need it, I might file a spec query, unless someone can tell me what I've missed. Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
