On 12.07.2016 15:44, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 12.07.2016 um 13:40 schrieb Nicolai Hähnle:
From: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>

This fixes a regression introduced by commit d8d6091a8.

Heap allocations may be only 8-byte aligned on 32-bit system, and so having
members with 16-byte alignment (such as in the case where pipe_blend_color is
embedded in radeonsi's si_context) is undefined behavior which indeed causes
crashes when compiled with gcc -O3.

Rather than track down and fix all allocation sites where a pipe_blend_color
may be embedded, assume that the original compiler bug only affects 64-bits.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96835
Cc: Tim Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Chuck Atkins <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
--
This should fix the linked bug report. The big question is whether the
assumption about the original compiler problem is correct?
---
  src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h 
b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h
index a73a771..1986495 100644
--- a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h
+++ b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h
@@ -335,8 +335,13 @@ struct pipe_blend_color
      * unaligned accessors resulting in a segfault.  Specifically several
      * versions of the Intel compiler are known to be affected but it's likely
      * others are as well.
+    *
+    * This only applies on 64-bit architectures, and adding the alignment on
+    * 32-bit architectures causes bugs because heap allocations are not
+    * sufficiently aligned.
      */
-   PIPE_ALIGN_VAR(16) float color[4];
+   PIPE_ALIGN_VAR(sizeof(void *) >= 8 ? 16 : 4)
+   float color[4];
  };


Honestly, I'd rather get rid of it, this gets really hacky. (If the
compiler bug was happening in the driver, it could easily do alignment
on its own, even if possibly at the cost of a copy).

Note that technically, malloc allocations aren't guaranteed to be 16
byte on a 64bit arch. Rather, malloc() has to honor biggest alignment
for a standard type (and no, __mm128 doesn't count), which on x64 linux
is long double (128bit). No idea if that's the case everywhere (even if
it's not, there's of course some possibility it will return 16 byte
aligned addresses anyway).

Yeah, I'm really not happy about this either. Tim, Chuck, given that the original fix created a new bug, is this something you could just fix in the affected driver instead?

Nicolai


Roland


_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to